Here is image 1 - calculate the weight of the criteria. In this photo, the author uses the pairwise comparison method to calculate. Specifically, we will compare rows and columns. If:
- If the line is more important than the column, then: 2 points
- Lines are as important as columns: 1 point
- If the line is less important than the column, then: 0 points
This method uses British practice.
This is photo 2 - rank the values of the positions. To make this ranking, the author has assessed the position to see how much that position is for each criterion. After having the level of each criterion, the author will use that as a basis to convert to points and calculate the total score.
By the way, I also filtered and retyped the photo to save memories. To produce the results of the two pictures above, in my opinion, the author followed the following steps:
Step 1: Determine the set of criteria. Criteria for assessing work value
A. Minimum Required Competencies"
A1. Academic level
A2. Experience required to do the job
A3. Ability to use and exploit the device
B. Responsibilities:
B1. Scope of influence on areas of activity
B2. The degree of influence on the work of others
B3. Impact of decisions
C. Job characteristics:
C1. Degree of job mastery
C2. Complexity and variability in work
C3. Labor type
D. Relationship:
D1. Internal working relationship
D2. External working relationship
E. Working environment and conditions:
E1. Consumption of physical labor
E2. Consumption of mind
E3. Working environment and conditions
Step 2: Use the pairwise comparison method to calculate the weight of the criteria (picture 1)
Step 3: Determine the level and score for the levels for the above criteria
Step 4: Evaluate the level for the positions and calculate the total score to rank the value of the positions (photo 2)
When I have some free time, I will make an excel file, retype it and fill in the missing parts of the photos : EASY
Nguyen Hung CuongRevisions
- 07.04.2023 @ 15:05 [Current Revision] by admin
- 07.04.2023 @ 15:05 [Autosave] by admin
- 07.04.2023 @ 15:05 by admin
- 07.04.2023 @ 15:02 by admin
Revision Differences
| 07.04.2023 @ 15:02 | Current Revision | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Content | |||
| Today by chance, I saw that my friend shared 2 professional photos, so I took the liberty to put it on the blog for the whole family to read. Here are the photos: | Today by chance, I saw that my friend shared 2 professional photos, so I took the liberty to put it on the blog for the whole family to read. Here are the photos: | ||
| <img src="https:// blognhansu.net.vn/wp-content/ uploads/2023/ 04/Ty-trong- cac-tieu-chi- danh-gia- | <img src="https:// blognhansu.net.vn/wp-content/ uploads/2023/ 04/Ty-trong- cac-tieu-chi- danh-gia-gia- trị-cong-viec.jpg" alt="" width="1013" height="750" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28288" /> | ||
| Here is image 1 - calculate the weight of the criteria. In this photo, the author uses the pairwise comparison method to calculate. Specifically, we will compare rows and columns. If: | Here is image 1 - calculate the weight of the criteria. In this photo, the author uses the pairwise comparison method to calculate. Specifically, we will compare rows and columns. If: | ||
| - If the line is more important than the column, then: 2 points | - If the line is more important than the column, then: 2 points | ||
| - Lines are as important as columns: 1 point | - Lines are as important as columns: 1 point | ||
| - If the line is less important than the column, then: 0 points | - If the line is less important than the column, then: 0 points | ||
| This method uses British practice. | This method uses British practice. | ||
| <img src="https:// blognhansu.net.vn/wp-content/ uploads/2023/ 04/Bang-dinh- gia-xep-hang- gia-tri-cong-viec.jpg" alt="" width ="758" height="750" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28287" /> | <img src="https:// blognhansu.net.vn/wp-content/ uploads/2023/ 04/Bang-dinh- gia-xep-hang- gia-tri-cong-viec.jpg" alt="" width ="758" height="750" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28287" /> | ||
| This is photo 2 - rank the values of the positions. To make this ranking, the author has assessed the position to see how much that position is for each criterion. After having the level of each criterion, the author will use that as a basis to convert to points and calculate the total score. | This is photo 2 - rank the values of the positions. To make this ranking, the author has assessed the position to see how much that position is for each criterion. After having the level of each criterion, the author will use that as a basis to convert to points and calculate the total score. | ||
| By the way, I also filtered and retyped the photo to save memories. To produce the results of the two pictures above, in my opinion, the author followed the following steps: | By the way, I also filtered and retyped the photo to save memories. To produce the results of the two pictures above, in my opinion, the author followed the following steps: | ||
| Step 1: Determine the set of criteria. Criteria for assessing work value | Step 1: Determine the set of criteria. Criteria for assessing work value | ||
| A. Minimum Required Competencies" | A. Minimum Required Competencies" | ||
| A1. Academic level | A1. Academic level | ||
| A2. Experience required to do the job | A2. Experience required to do the job | ||
| A3. Ability to use and exploit the device | A3. Ability to use and exploit the device | ||
| B. Responsibilities: | B. Responsibilities: | ||
| B1. Scope of influence on areas of activity | B1. Scope of influence on areas of activity | ||
| B2. The degree of influence on the work of others | B2. The degree of influence on the work of others | ||
| B3. Impact of decisions | B3. Impact of decisions | ||
| C. Job characteristics: | C. Job characteristics: | ||
| C1. Degree of job mastery | C1. Degree of job mastery | ||
| C2. Complexity and variability in work | C2. Complexity and variability in work | ||
| C3. Labor type | C3. Labor type | ||
| D. Relationship: | D. Relationship: | ||
| D1. Internal working relationship | D1. Internal working relationship | ||
| D2. External working relationship | D2. External working relationship | ||
| E. Working environment and conditions: | E. Working environment and conditions: | ||
| E1. Consumption of physical labor | E1. Consumption of physical labor | ||
| E2. Consumption of mind | E2. Consumption of mind | ||
| E3. Working environment and conditions | E3. Working environment and conditions | ||
| Step 2: Use the pairwise comparison method to calculate the weight of the criteria (picture 1) | Step 2: Use the pairwise comparison method to calculate the weight of the criteria (picture 1) | ||
| Step 3: Determine the level and score for the levels for the above criteria | Step 3: Determine the level and score for the levels for the above criteria | ||
| Step 4: Evaluate the level for the positions and calculate the total score to rank the value of the positions (photo 2) | Step 4: Evaluate the level for the positions and calculate the total score to rank the value of the positions (photo 2) | ||
| When I have some free time, I will make an excel file, retype it and fill in the missing parts of the photos : EASY | When I have some free time, I will make an excel file, retype it and fill in the missing parts of the photos : EASY | ||
| Nguyen Hung Cuong | Nguyen Hung Cuong | ||
Note: Spaces may be added to comparison text to allow better line wrapping.
No comments yet.